In case there was still any doubt in anyone’s mind that Hans will get acquitted, I’d like to quote a story NBC wrote:
But whatever suspicion their findings manage to cast on Reiser, prosecutors must still contend with California’s tough rules on circumstantial evidence. Judges in the state are required to instruct jurors that if the evidence suggests “two reasonable interpretations,” one pointing to guilt and the other innocence, they must reject the guilty interpretation.
Clearly the evidence does not even indicate for certain that any murder was even committed; there are millions of alternate explanations for the facts.
August 20, 2007
Today CBS 5 reported that an extra search for Nina near Hans’ home was fruitless. It is coming on close to a year for valient Hans, and yet still absolutely no trace of Nina. This only furthers my conviction that Hans is sure to be acquitted of murder.